Done, or not done
There are no dates on this page. A roadmap with promised dates on a memecoin is a marketing device, not a plan, and missing them would be the first dishonest thing this project did. A milestone here is complete or it is pending, and the list updates when reality does.
- Thesis publishedThe argument, the evidence base, and the nulls.done
- Measurement protocol specSix stages, frozen prompt set, pre-registration.done
- Evidence base assembledSix findings, every one sourced and dated.done
- Site and docs liveTwelve pages, terms, and risk disclosure.done
- Token launched on pump.funContract address published here the moment it exists.pending
- Creator fee routing liveSplit wallets configured and published.pending
- Baseline measurement runFirst frozen set run across the model panel.pending
- First result publishedWin or null, published identically.pending
What each stage is for
Establish the claim and the counter-evidence
Write the thesis, assemble the evidence base including everything that argues against it, specify the measurement protocol, and publish the whole thing before asking anyone for attention. This is done. It is the site you are reading.
Create the token and publish the address
Launch on pump.fun, select Creator Fees rather than Trader Cashback, configure the split wallets, and publish every address here so the routing is verifiable on-chain. The contract address appears in the bar at the top of every page the moment it exists.
Measure before doing anything
Freeze the prompt set, publish its hash, and run it across the model panel to establish what models say about ACME before any intervention. Without this number every later claim is unfalsifiable. The run-to-run variance from this stage sets the noise floor.
Spend on exactly one thing and measure it
Pre-register the hypothesis, spend creator-fee revenue on a single pre-declared channel, then remeasure with the identical frozen set. No re-specification after seeing results. The first target is earned third-party coverage, the only channel with supporting evidence.
Publish the result, whatever it is
Delta, confidence interval, raw runs, analysis script. A null result publishes in exactly the same format and place as a positive one. This is the part the rest of the category does not do, and it is the actual contribution.
What could stop this
No trading volume
Funding is a share of trading fees. If nobody trades, there is no money for inference and the measurement work does not happen. This is the most likely failure mode by a distance.
Platform changes
pump.fun sets its own fee structure and has revised it more than once. It can change again, in either direction, without notice and without our involvement.
The answer is no
The experiment may simply show that deliberate name establishment does not work. That is a real outcome, it gets published like any other, and it would make the token worth nothing.